>Drops of blood here and there. Not what I expected from a man
>who was covered in blood. I expect to see it smeared all over.
>Especially since he was keyed up, and in a hurry to catch a
>commercial flight. I expect more mess. It was too clean. Maybe
>planted? Defense proved motive and opportunity to plant blood
>evidence.
>
>Not guilty. Innocent, even.

His exact shoeprint was also at the scene, blood on his car, blood on his hat, etc. But like you already conceded, he could've been an accomplice rather than the actual killer; that I wouldn't rule out entirely.

But him being uninvolved entirely I simply will never buy.