I haven't put any spin on your words either, btw.
None at all.

>All I'm saying is don't expect an automatic media storm when
>police brutality hits a white person, because it rarely
>happens that way ...for whatever reason you choose to
>believe.

Cool... but there is already a media storm
around this, and PimpTrick was pointing out
how different the coverage appears.
In elaborating on your point that it's not covered
when the victims are white, you said...
"All im responding to is the notion that "oh now that it's a white person, let's see them suddenly care"
and
"it would be faulty to assume its going to be treated as a bigger deal when a white person gets killed."
PimpTrick didn't say ANY of that, so he's either
proxy for someone else, your misread what he typed,
your point was a diversion, or some combination of the 3.
That's not me sparring... that's just logical.


>All that other shit is you trying to quarrel for no reason.
>And since police brutality affects black people harder than
>white people (absolutely no question about it), I think we'd
>all like to see the broader society including white people
>feel a bit more invested in this aka it would be good for it
>to hit home with white folks too aka it would be good if the
>media didn't brush it under the rug. That's all.
>
>Miss me with that other shit.


Not sure what "other shit" you're talking about,
but I agree with that paragraph for the most part.