>When talks about people in the group he is talking about
>Black people.

That would not make any sense in context, given he's saying that black people don't have the same interests as BLM. He can't be both generalizing BLM as somehow representative of black people and also unrepresentative as well. Think about it.


>
>
>^^^^^^^^
>
>>In the bottom paragraph, is it racist to generalize black
>>interests as opposed to the nefarious in his view ends of
>BLM?
>>It's definitely a racial generalization I wouldn't
>personally
>>make (I don't usually speak in terms of one groups
>interests,
>>and wouldn't seek to define black interests in this way),
>but
>>is it racist to say a groupn is misrepresenting it's
>supposed
>>constituency? Seems like a stretch,
>>
>>
>
>So a white alt right troll in Canada can speak for common
>black people and Black communities ?
>
>"BLM leadership is outta touch with common black people"
>
>"This is not a common idealogy in black communities"
>
>None of that is a racist generalization ?

It would only be racist, as I see it, to generalize in this way if one were saying that, essentially, the political movement in question would appeal to the interests of a community, if only the community were smarter/better/more morally sound. Denny is saying just the opposite--that BLM is morally bankrupt, and black people's interests aren't served by this deficient organization.

His statement can be incorrect, but it's hard to see how it could be considered racist.