>I actually appreciate that you're saying both
>parties are "privileged" (even though I think that's a bad
>term to use, since it's tainted by unprovable theories), but
>the context HAS to be understood.
>


Adding: bad term to use, since it's tainted by unprovable
theories AND taken from a discourse that was originally
meant to examine white supremacy. As stated elsewhere,
new privilege discourse has diffused the ORIGINAL discourse
to the point of neutrality by applying it to everyone.
It's literally white folks saying "I'm oppressive? But but
we're ALL oppressive!" (McIntosh admitted that)
It's kinda All Lives Matter logic, and I just don't think
Black people need to keep allowing ourselves to be played like this.