>I explained the difference in McIntosh's brand of privilege
>discourse very thoroughly under point 2, beginning where I
>said her brand is a deflection from original privilege
>discourse. The only thing I see that I could have said
>differently was to begin point 2 with "Pop culture privilege
>discourse" instead of just "privilege discourse." It
>shouldn't have been difficult to understand either way if it
>was read though. Do you have a legitimate rebuttal or are you
>sticking with just not reading?

Don't blame me for your sloppy generalizations. You dismissed the discourse wholesale as disingenuous without acknowledging the ongoing valid forms of privilege discourse. Yo mistake.

>First of all, you're pulling from the quote where Mutua was
>explaining the CLAIM that intersectionality makes, which is
>why the next sentence is literally "In suggesting this,
>intersectionality also made a second claim about identity."

My mistake. My confusion here spawns from your jumbled "intersectionality vs. multidimensionality" argument which hinges on the baseless assertion that "intersectionality tends to view 'gender' as being synonymous with female." Have fun backing that claim up.

That reductive bullshit is confusing when you go ahead and make intersectio...my bad "multidimensional" arguments like this:

>2nd, the overall point I'm making (and the point being raised
>in that essay) is that Black men are ALSO victimized based on
>their gender, as white patriarchy operates according to
>"hegemonic masculinity" (R.W. Connell) which seeks to
>exterminate the Black male who is deemed a subordinate male
>threat. History corroborates this, as do present statistics.
>The Black male was not scientifically deemed a rapist by the
>American Ethnological Institute only because he is Black but
>because he is both Black and male. Same goes for astronomical
>rates of incarceration, police killings, and funneling of
>Black boys into special ed.

Which I actually agree with. For the most part. Black men being subject to gendered racism (we are) is not proof that we also don't experience male privilege (we do, as evidenced by Black men out-earning Black women by like 8 percent).