and they were only presented facts allowed by the law and the rules of evidence.

we in the court of public opinion are not so constrained.

>Who gives a shit that people who read a couple of articles and
>transcript excerpts concluded he was guilty when the people
>who looked at everything, an almost all white jury mind you,
>found him not guilty?

ppl who are trying to $ell a movie to the public should give a shit about what the public has read about the movie's director and star that may impact the public's decision to buy movie tix.

*shrugs*