13048242, That's silly trendy thinking. Posted by Buddy_Gilapagos, Mon Jul-25-16 09:34 AM
Mainly because both problems can't be the true threat. It's probably either one or the other. If underpopulation is a real problem, then you probably won't have to worry about the over-consumption problem (it would actually be hillarisad for humanity if we hasten the underpopulation problem by being too aggressive on the over-consumption problem).
Either underpopulation is a real threat or trend or it isn't.
>when we can't even say the planet will be able to sustain >human life for the next century. it's an nth degreee bleow >the sun is going to explode. > >█▆▇▅▇█▇▆▄▁▃ >Big PEMFin H & z's >"I ain't no entertainer, and ain't trying to be one. I am 1 >thing, a musician." � Miles > >"When the music stops he falls back in the abyss."
********** "Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson
"what's a leader if he isn't reluctant"
|