13011572, I would say now because of 360 deals. Posted by Buddy_Gilapagos, Tue Apr-26-16 02:33 PM
The difference is then they were signing shitty deals AND just not making that much money from deals.
To counter that I would say that artist now have more leverage when signing deals because they have the ability to create a brand before signing way more now then they did then.
I just think it depends. Chief Keef signed an 7 album deal just like Brand nubians did.
But there were Puffy's then and there are Puffy's now.
>We're debating it on Twitter right now. Someone started with >a typically Twitter-like Tweet saying "Black male in the >industry in 1995 was a label CEO, a 25 year old Black male in >the music industry in 2016 is a Xanax Junkie." > >I responded calling out the foolishness of it...but everyone >basically said rappers sign worse deals today than in the 90's >due to 360 Deals. As bad as 360 Deals are, I feel like rappers >were signing even worse deals back in the day, they just >didn't have a defined title such as a "360." What would you >say? I'm sure Double 0 can drop some knowledge on this.
********** "Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson
"what's a leader if he isn't reluctant"
|