>>>until the mid 90s.
>>>
>>>I'm so amused by Warren's deification as some paragon of
>the
>>>political left, lol.She exemplifies a "flip-flop" far more
>>>extreme than any of HRC's evolutions.
>
>
>>
>>a change of direction 20 years ago isn't a flip-flop, FYI.
>
>And yet, Sanders supporters wanted to burn HRC on a stake for
>volunteering for a Republican over 50 YEARS ago.


i hadn't heard that. didn't even know she did that. also, those Sanders supporters are dumb if true.


>>
>> Or the financial system bailout/TARP, which
>>>Elizabeth Warren actually chaired the Congressional
>>Oversight
>>>Panel for.
>>
>>wait, how is this a knock against Warren?
>
>Sanders opposed TARP, and both he and his supporters like to
>rage incessantly about HRC's ties to the financial industry.
>So I find it interesting when Sanders supporters deify
>Elizabeth Warren, when she was a Republican lawyer who, at one
>time, worked in support of big financial institutions during
>her time at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, and then decades
>later steered the implementation of a bailout program that
>Sanders continues to criticize.
>

i'm not well-versed on the full particulars of the bailout, but it's my understanding that she was part of committee vs. a dictator making singular rulings about the banks. i do know republicans and the banks were very much against her inclusion in the process, so i'd have to assume that she herself at least had issues with the bailout despite it going through. if she was pro-bailout i'd think those banks would have been happy to have her involved. just my thoughts.