>1.) No matter how you slice it, when it comes to raw vote
>totals, Bernie Sanders is losing. Badly. He's outside of the
>envelope of reason in terms of saying he's in striking
>distance. It's one thing to say he's only behind by 260
>delegates (which is substantial), but it's the nearly 3million
>votes that he's down by that can't be overlooked. Sorry,
>that's just the numbers.

Bruh, there's 3 million voters who couldn't vote in NY alone simply because they aren't registered Republican or Democrat. Now, obviously all those people, had they voted, would not have voted for Sanders. That said, NY isn't the only place where this happens and it should be noted.

>
>2.) I'm not "excited" about Hillary Clinton because I know
>what she's going to do and it's exactly what I want her to do.
> Continue to iterate on Barack Obama's policy agenda, tweak
>what needs tweaking, throw out what needs throwing out, and
>responsibly steward the government through America's shift
>back to the left.
>
>I'm not asking for a savior. Things for me ain't that bad,
>I'm asking for an able administrator who can make things be
>not that bad for everyone else too.

Right. That's the problem. Things for YOU ain't that bad so the status quo seems fine. Despite all of the good Barack has done, the economic standing of the vast majority of Americans has gotten WORSE over his presidency (I'm not blaming him for that, per se, BTW). Hillary isn't going to do as much as Barack did while in office, soooooooo...how will it get better for those folks? Also, like dude below said, she's gonna shift right, not left.