Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjectRE: wat
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=12733664&mesg_id=12734561
12734561, RE: wat
Posted by initiationofplato, Tue Feb-24-15 10:02 AM
>I have never said photons decay.
>
>The fact that in every one of your replies to me, no matter
>how many times I say "I have never said photons decay, I've
>said THE DENSITY OF PHOTONS DECREASES IN AN INVERSE SQUARE
>RATIO TO DISTANCE FROM LIGHT SOURCE" you keep saying I have
>said anything about "decay" implies you're too set in your
>views to bother conversing with. Nothing sinks in, does it?
>You're a closed book to the rest of humanity, only changeable
>by your own flawed and naive imagination.
>
>Kindly fuck off and disappear into your world of moronic
>wonder and stop pretending you're even engaging a brain.
>
>The "deep questions" you ask in these threads; EVERY "cosmic
>realization" you come on here and brag that you've made that
>nobody else can have possibly thought of have been asked by
>humanity for thousands of years, there's at least one moron on
>every forum on the whole Internet who posts exactly the same
>shit. You're not unique, you're just intellectually stunted.
>I've suggested books for you to read which will put these
>flights of fancy you have into logical perspective. I've
>suggested documentary films in case the books are too
>difficult. I've even offered you the word of a scientist with
>a PHD in the physics of light. Yet you refuse to believe if
>YOUR BRAIN didn't invent the answer, someone else's logic
>might be worth considering - you haven't even engaged with my
>posts enough to UNDERSTAND what I've written (why otherwise
>would you continue to post that I've said photons
>"decay"?!)... I've even offered the thoughts of someone who's
>specialised in how light behaves for the last 8 years of their
>life.
>
>You're a fucking joke. You're an abject failure of a human
>being and I will only enter your threads to laugh at your
>existence from this point onwards.
>
>You're a real world incarnation of Philomena Cunk, and I claim
>my five pounds.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvpbW7JRu0Q


First of all. Take a chill pill. Second of all, where did I brag about anything? You have created a pretty strange fantasy I don't really want to star in. I get excited/enthusiastic about exploring ideas and I certainly do not brag about anything that has crossed my mind. I'm not exactly sure what you are projecting, but I don't appreciate it.

All one has to do is take a look at the Deep Field imaging to see the potency/density of light. From then on, you just need to consider that the technological curve is growing, thus allowing humanity to process sharper quality images, and rely on basic
laws which state that light will travel infinitely if unobstructed as photons do not decay. Yes, the density decays but given the astounding quality/clarity of light that has been traveling for 12 billion years is astonishing and indicative of the incomprehensible density it can yield.

Shrug. If you did not get your panties in a bunch, or make this personal, or psychological, we could have had a real discussion, but as always, you come into my posts with the sole intent of attempting to prove me wrong or to illuminate something you think is inferior to your understanding of the nature of things. All one has to do is take a look at the post about alcohol and our conversation to get a gist of the patterns you put into motion. :)