support the movement.

which is whatever. do you i guess but

are we about the movement/cause or so-called leaders?

as someone previously stated even those 'faces' of movements didn't work on their own
and weren't necessarily even the 'leaders' they were the voice and the face but didn't make
decisions on their own.

the past has shown us that having a visible leader (or leaders) is dangerous to the actual movement.

look at what happened to the civil rights movement of the 50s/60s
look at what happened to the black liberation movements of the 70s
when you have 'leaders' its too easy to throw the movement off by discrediting, arresting or killing the 'leader'
when people find their positions and act accordingly
among several 'leaders' coming together and networking etc
there's less of a chance of crushing the movement by getting rid of a few folks.

but maybe i'm bugging.