12637533, Right? Posted by Mageddon, Mon Nov-03-14 06:40 AM
He's not a woman beater because he doesn't look like this?
http://richardkane.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/wifebeater.jpg
Because he's not (from what we know) in any sort of long abusive relationship?
Basically arguing semantics, but you're still wrong.
>Aside from all the other stuff....this: > >"Fuck Jian, but calling him a "woman beater" is fucking >retarded" > >I just don't get what you're saying. In light of knowing that >you HAVE read the accounts of the women....are you not backing >off that statement? If not, what kind of stubborn are you? I >said shit in the beginning of this thread that I tried to make >amends for too. Knowing that you know the accounts made by >the 9 different woman (not including some anynomous >accusations on social media BEFORE the scandal >happened)....honestly, I'd be disturbed in your reluctance to >use the word 'woman beater' for his purported actions. Not >only is it not applicable....it's fucking retarded?
|