81896, RE: So much to cover still. Posted by wallysmith, Mon Jun-09-14 09:12 PM
>I'm going with how the books roll: If you don't see a >character die, he/she probably isn't dead.
Serious. I need to stop falling for the rope a dope
>Tyrion killing Tywin on the shitter should make the audience >happy after the shit that Tyrion has gone through this season. >That and him strangling Shae with the Hand's chain.
Not entirely sure about this. Despite his antagonism towards Tyrion, Tywin is a fan favorite because the character is so well written and compelling. I'm sure people will cheer Tyrion surviving, but it'll be bittersweet with Tywin's machinations gone.
And re: Lady Stoneheart, that's why you've got to show her and >the Brotherhood killing the Freys first. The initial "Oh >shit!" moment has to be that she's back and she's getting >revenge on the people that betrayed and killed her and her >son. It adds too much if she's back and she's hanging Brienne.
I think you're spot on here. While I think it'd be beastly to end the season with her (supposed) hanging, I do think it's important to establish LSH's motivations first.
However, now that I'm thinking about this... LSH might be too much of a reveal if she's not the *final* reveal of the season. I'm thinking this might get pushed to next season then, with Tyrion/Tywin as the final scene of the season. While LSH would be a mindblowing reveal this season, there's still plenty of material to work with too.
>Well, if they had eliminated some of the extraneous stuff in >last night's episode, they could have fit in Stannis. We >really didn't need 20 minutes of Sam mooning over Gilly. >Episode could have ended with Stannis coming to the rescue, >and the election could have been done in the final episode, >only in a less convoluted way.
Pretty much. Although I do understand needing to deepen that relationship before their eventual journey, it's just not... exciting.
|