94315, So the fuck what!? Fucker couldn't even write soldiers who spoke Posted by TheMindFrame, Tue Feb-09-10 12:56 PM
like soldiers. GTFOH!
>Jesus H. Christ, you act like Mark Boal just took John >McClane and transported him to Iraq, then had Kathryn Bigelow >follow him around with a handheld camera. > >I mean, honestly. > > >wga.com > >>Bombs Under Baghdad >Written by Denis Faye > >Given Time recently described The Hurt Locker as “a near >perfect war movie,” its adrenaline-addicted protagonist, bomb >squad Army staff sergeant William James (played by Jeremy >Renner) could go down as one of the silver screen’s great >macho protagonists, right next to Rooster Cogburn, Snake >Plisskin and Martin Riggs. The problem is, that’s not what >screenwriter Mark Boal had in mind. > >“I don’t think any of it was Hollywood-inspired. It was >inspired by real life,” claims Boal, a veteran Rolling Stone, >Playboy and The Village Voice journalist who is responsible >for the article upon which Paul Haggis’ In the Valley of Elah >was based. “It’s a composite of different people that I met. >My source material was the reporting that I’ve done. I didn’t >have a bunch of cinematic references.” > >True, it’s obvious that Boal’s time as an embedded reporter in >Iraq shaped The Hurt Locker, directed by Katherine Bigelow, >into something special, but James’ manly antics are, at times, >one eye-patch short of John Wayne. It’s something the writer >only figured out in retrospect. > >“Having talked to a bunch of people who know more about film >than I do, I realize that, in fact, he does come from a long >line of cinematic types,” he concedes. “But at the time it was >just an attempt to be faithful to real life and actually >present somebody that was a complicated character. Maybe on >the surface, to be brimming with bravado and hubris, yet have >an inner life that’s very complicated.” > >Boal talked with the Writers Guild of America, West Web site >recently about the importance of these inner character lives >in The Hurt Locker, how journalism intersects with >screenwriting, and how Paul Haggis saved him from having to >apply to film school. > > >Does your journalism background affect the way you approach >screenwriting? > >It does. Journalism is all about telling a story through >detail, so I took that aspect with me to screenwriting. And as >a journalist, my head is oriented toward stories that are >topical and relevant. > > >Another thing you pick up on as a journalist is capturing the >dialogue, because sometimes you don’t have a tape recorder. >I’ve interviewed all kinds of people and listened to different >people talk from different walks of life. That professional >listening you do as a journalist carries over into >screenwriting when it comes time to invent characters. > > >So you have an innate sense of dialogue after interviewing all >those people? > >I don’t know. I don’t want to toot my own horn, but I think in >terms of similarities between the two forms. The type of >journalism that I do, which is long-form feature writing, is >very detail-oriented and dialogue is very important to telling >the story. > > >How did you feel about not being restrained by the facts as a >screenwriter? Good or bad? > >It was good and bad. It was in some ways really liberating and >exciting to be able to invent, but at the same time, as is the >case with everything, sometimes it’s easier to have fewer >possibilities than unlimited possibilities. > > >The internal arcs of the characters seemed far more important >than the outer arc of keeping bombs from exploding. Was that >intentional? > >Yeah. It’s a character piece sort of masquerading as an action >movie. > > >It was inspired by your time as an embedded journalist. From >all the stories you garnered from that, why was this the one >you decided to tell? > >That goes back to the character. I was really struck by the >personalities that I met over there. I just really wanted to >tell a character story that took you past the headlines of >what it means to be a hero, to look at somebody who has a lot >of courage and bravado and pays a price for that. That was >really the starting point – starting from character more than >any particular plot line. Then it became about marrying that >character, or those different characters, with a through >line. > > >Speaking of that through line, it’s not really the standard >three-act structure. It felt episodic, yet you managed to tell >a really compelling story without the standard conventions. > >It’s the not the first war movie to be told in chapters. >Apocalypse Now is told in chapters, in sort of an episodic >way. And I think that war is like that in the sense that war >doesn’t have a neat, little through line. I didn’t want to >write one of those movies where the whole story revolved >around one particular mission because I was trying to capture >the daily grind of the job. It would have felt like a >distasteful imposition to make it seem like there was one >master terrorist and all these guys had to do was diffuse this >one masterful bomb and everything would be okay. It’s not like >that. It’s a tidal wave of bombs. So the structure came about >in an attempt to be faithful to the reality of the situation, >more than any preconceived notion that it should be three acts >or four acts or episodic or something else. I think there’s >nothing wrong with those kinds of (three act) movies, but >there are enough of them out there, so why not try something >different? > >By the way, ironically, the character stuff does kind of break >down into three acts. In some ways it’s hard to get around. > > >How do you compare this experience with In the Valley of Elah >with Paul Haggis? > >They were both great, but it’s apples and oranges. I worked >closely with Paul. It was basically my screenwriting graduate >seminar compressed into a short period of time. That was >really his movie, but with The Hurt Locker, I wrote the >script, I produced it with Katherine, and I’ve been involved >with it every step of the creative process, from writing to >set design to editing. I was enmeshed in the film. > >________________________________________________________________________ >http://www.youtube.com/user/punannydiaries > >http://thepunannydiaries.com > >also on Facebook
|