>if you were to take everyone's top 100 reccomendations and
>put them into a pool there would probably be about 4000 in
>there. To take these and somehow figure out what the top
>100 is so subjective and impossibily arduous. It's a fun
>game to play but in the end any kind of definitive list of
>"Greatest . . . . of all time" omits so many amazing works.
>Anyway, enjoy the films, I respect your passion for the art.

every pool of people who've done such a list have been from a specified field. imdb.com wouldn't necessarily agree with Sight & Sound readers. Roger Ebert wouldn't necessarily see eye-to-eye with David Walsh. we all have our biases, special interests, needs, quirks, pet peeves, and such. in the end, in the disclaimer that shall precede the list, i will let it be known, although i may call it "the 100 greatest films of all-time," it still is only my opinion.

to repeat, " because after all, what do studied critics and directors know that a teenage kid can't correct."