9319, What are you refering to? Posted by Brooklynbeef, Sat May-10-03 09:13 AM
You spoke of some special thing in X-men 3?
>It's funny that people say that it was better than the >original. I really didn't have any major problems with the >first movie. I liked how it established who the X-Men were, >as well as exploring the philosophical differences between >Professor X and Magneto...and if you're a student of Black >History, you'd identify who each man was a philosophical >mirror of... > >Now, onto the second movie. Very, very well done. I had no >problems with the script. Very clean, very simple. Singer >and company did a nice job reestablishing everyone in the >first half hour or so... > >I'm sure there will be folks who expect this to be the Halle >Berry/Storm Show, since "she's the star." Those people >should keep their asses at home. She did a fine job, as did >Hugh Jackman, Famke Jannesen, Anna Paquin, Alan Cumming, >(and as always) Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen. The >actors playing the young boys were also good as well. And >Bryan Cox made for a great villain, with the perfect >motivation for what he does. > >Oh, and one last thing...those who were wishing for...a >certain thing to happen may just get their wish, since there >will almost certainly be an X3... > >I won't say that this is "better than the original" for the >reasons I've already stated. But I will say that this one >"expounds and expands" the universe of the original, and >that's what a sequel to this type of film should do, IMO... >______________________________________________ >"BDP in 1992 is KRS-ONE, Willie D and Kenny Parker! BDP in >1992 is not D-Nice, Jamal-ski, Harmony, Ms. Melodie and >Scottie Morris. They are not down with BDP so stop >frontin'. We roll tight and hard this year because too many >people want something for nothing." >-from the BDP "Sex and Violence" liner notes
|