>
>The Son said many times he was a representive of the Father,
>for example in John 17:3 where he called his Father the only
>true God and said that the true God _sent_ him.

Response: I then he goes on to command God to return to him the glory that he once shared with him before the foundations of the world. Remember God does not share his glory.
>
>The Son was also the King designate while on the earth.
>Your reasoning for Chronicles explains why men could
>properly give
>προσκυνεω to
>Jesus as the representive of the Father.

Response: But what else did I say? That they did not give David worship in a religious since. But in Rev 5:13 all of creation is giving both the Son and the Father the same praise in the highest form. Futhermore, they both recieve the same type of praise, notice the following.

Rev 4:11 we see that the Father is worthy to recieve HONOR, GLORY, AND POWER..

Hop over to Rev 5:12 the lamb recieves....

HONOR, GLORY AND POWER,

then both recieve HONOR, GLORY, AND POWER.

No representative of God can recieve the same glory, honor, and power, as the Father, if Jesus is not God then all of creatoin is committing idolotry.
>
>
>George Kaplin
>georg_kaplin@yahoo.com
>Ερρωσθε!