>>If you ever attended university, it would be in a jar.
>>Undergraduates would dissect that tiny brain of yours and
>muse
>>over how it is possible that a troglodyte was born in the
>late
>>twentieth century.
>
>uh huh. o.k. what relevance does this has too anything except
>that your a sad and bitter little man?

It's completely relevant to post 178. You either don't have a scooby doo about what is being discussed in this forum, or you spend far too much time writing whilst pissed. For example WTF did you hope to achieve with this:

>the fact that humanity has to be promoted is morally abhorenet.
>what do i have to explain?
>Slavery is an Anomaly? ?

Have you understood anything that either InVerse or I have been discussing?

What I asked InVerse to explain, and then asked you (because I naively thought you were actually beginning to engage with this forum) is the apparent anomaly between the 'objectivity of Chrisitianity' and its original stance on (and which justified) slavery.



And why do you respond to my clear and concise questions with three or four quasi-enlightened, completely irrelevant qualifying questions? Do you think it conveys an image if intellect?