I know you trying to have a discussion with Inverse, but your use of language is fucking terrible. And perhaps you dont see the reason in engaging in this kind of thing. You are attempting to change and enlarge peoples world view.

>My opinion of your worldview has not changed an iota!


>Why don't you see how pigheaded it is to claim to be appealing
>to an objective truth? If there is a 'universal truth' it
>simply can't come from or be expressed by humans. Where then
>does it come from, and how can we begin understand it? (Bear
>in mind our 'subject, verb, object' language).

You cannot appeal to Objective truth. An Objective truth should appeal to reasonable people because it is a fact. Universal Law(never heard of any sych phrase as Universal truth) is essentially Karma...what you do comes back to you. How you understand it is by living and learning from the lessons life deals you.


>It has HUMAN value. It appeals to the same sentiments of other
>HUMANS. Call it emotional but when an individual is kidnapped,
>people come together in order to help, as does the
>institution. So it is meaningful.


not to this human. Your hypothetical situations do not appeal to my emotions. Using reason I can see that this is merely a discussion, so why should my emotions become involved?


>>So it is not a fact that "raping babies is wrong"?


morally wrong. But how do you define those morales? emotions? desires? that was what led to the hypothetical baby being raped in the first place.

But as a defence lawyer you would be laughed out of court! The
>legal system may be in some sense hypocritical; but tough
>shit! Majority view wins the day (or parliament view; but
>that's a different argument).

And that is the democratic system you support? mob rule?


>>And there you are, now, according to your worldview, might
>makes >right. If enough people decide that black people are
>3/5 human and >should be herded and worked like animals...
>then it IS SO.
>
>>All I'm doin here is exposing the logical consequence of your
>>worldview.
>
>
>Unfortunately yes, but that's when you either subscribe to it
>or become an activist (slavery, that is)...
>
>
>Remember that your objective Christianity justified slavery.
>
>Explain that one to me. Then answer the homosexuality
>question. I am logically ready!

Logically ready? aye o.k. captain

And you may be logically ready, but you are also morally abhorent.