"if she is enjoying it (although the initial intent was based purely on a violation) than no its not rape because now it is 2 adults enjoying an act

i believe that's why God regarding it as an evil act and required that they be stoned"

I was simply debunking the first posters assessment this is a more "immoral" time. You just agree that if there were no screams it could be due to it being a consensual act. But still say that stoning is just under this law. I don't agree that stoning people cause they got busy is moral in the least bit. But hey, maybe that's just me.