>just that in creating a myth
>based on an older one,
>one can leave out what
>they want. you can pick
>and choose what you want
>to pattern off of.
>
>if i red "green eggs and
>ham about a man whose
>never had them", then write
>a similar book but say
>"green eggs and bacon about
>a woman whose never eaten
>them"

First of all, you miss read what Osoclasi meant. Solarus mentioned the similarities, Osoclasi chose the differences. If the differences are greater than the similarities (such as chopped into pieces like osirus was) one has to assume then they have different origins. Just because they have similarities doesnt mean that they copy. Also Jesus is a Historical figure and it has been proven (Backed by eyewitness accounts). Osirus hasn't been proven as a historical figure.

The name lazarus was a popular name at that time and appeared twice in the new testament (Luke 16: 19) mentions of a lazarus separate from the one jesus rose from the dead. Are you goinmg to compare that Lazarus to Osirus too.