>Isn't that the first bood????
>And polygamy is not commended but
>it is exepted and prevalent...

Excepted by Humans.... Not expected by God

>
>>>The only romance is within the
>>>bible is between Soloman and
>>>ONE of his many wives.
>>
>>It's the only romance noted. That
>>doesnt mean other husbands didnt
>>romance their wife.
>
>That was not the question...

Okay then can you please clarify for me, the question you ask?


>>>Marriage definitely is not the
>>>same. As far as the
>>>sex issue, which was not
>>>really apart of the original
>>>question, it has been grossed
>>>due to society. Yet this
>>>society is the one that
>>>introduced romance into the equation
>>>of marriage. My question was
>>>whether it's biblical... <~~~~~~~~~ (Pointing)
>
>>To have a romantic interlude with
>>your husband or wife is
>>perfectly OK.
>
>Never said it wasn't, but romance
>is definitely not a necessity. <~~~~~~~ (pointing pt. 2)

But didn't you ask if it was Biblical or Not. I didnt say you said it wasn't okay. I just wanna point you to the last sentence in your paragraph. Are you asking whether "romancing" your better half is biblical?? or If it's (romance) necessary in a Marriage? Is that where think there's a difference?