>HTP
>
>The Bible is often considered as
>being the complete "works of
>the LORD." Even the
>hands of men have not
>been able to disturb or
>taint the "word of God."
>Or have they?
>
>In the Bible there are several
> references to other books
>of God that are not
>in the current (Protestant) Bible
>of today.
>Examples:
>
>(all from NASV)
>Numbers 21:14
>Therefore it is said in the
>Book of the Wars of
>the LORD
>
>Joshua 10:13
>So the sun stood still, and
>the moon stopped,
>Until the nation avenged themselves of
>their enemies.
>Is it not written in the
>book of Jashar? And the
>sun stopped in the middle
>of the sky and did
>not hasten to go down
>for about a whole day.
>
>
>2 Samuel 1:18
>and he told them to teach
>the sons of Judah the
>song of the bow; behold,
>it is written in the
>book of Jashar.
>
>1 Chronicles 29:29
>"Now the acts of King David,
>from first to last, are
>written in the chronicles of
>Samuel the seer, in the
>chronicles of Nathan the prophet
>and in the chronicles of
>Gad the seer,
>
>2 Chronicles 9:29
>Now the rest of the acts
>of Solomon, from first to
>last, are they not written
>in the records of Nathan
>the prophet, and in the
>prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite,
>and in the visions of
>Iddo the seer concerning Jeroboam
>the son of Nebat?
>
>2 Chronicles 12:15
>Now the acts of Rehoboam, from
>first to last, are they
>not written in the records
>of Shemaiah the prophet and
>of Iddo the seer, according
>to genealogical enrollment? And there
>were wars between Rehoboam and
>Jeroboam continually.
>
>2 Chronicles 20:34
>Now the rest of the acts
>of Jehoshaphat, first to last,
>behold, they are written in
>the annals of Jehu the
>son of Hanani, which is
>recorded in the Book of
>the Kings of Israel.
>
>
>So the question is: Where is
>the REST of the Bible?

Responce: Good question, there are some more you did'nt list but I get the point. Remember just because the bible mentioned these books does not mean they were insprired, they were just recordings of events. Ex: Paul in his ministry qouted some books that were from other sources (meaning non christians sources) but that does not mean that the book was insprired. He used it to prove a point, also it should be noted that the books from Joshua threw 2 Kings are referred to as the Dueto-historical books, what that means is that the authors were writting the books from the perspective of how Isreal and its Kings responded to the law of Duetoronomy, thats why they are together like they was the are. So its not an exhaustive historicle account more of a theological one.
>
>