>Okafor and Towns are the best bigs.

Not relevant as they will be gone.

Mudiay and Russell are
>the best guards and it seems the zingis train is picking up
>steam as the best euro prospect since the last best euro
>prospect. I still think winslow is better, but athletic 7
>foot shooters seem to make GMs drool like babies.

OK, so how is it "clear" if FOUR GUYS could potentially could potentially be the No. 3 pick? To me having your pick of them is not as valuable as getting what's left of them *and* another very good selection.

You and I both think Winslow might be be the best of the bunch, so why not move down, get him and add another piece? I am definitely not as enamored with Russell as some. Porzingis has plenty of question marks.
Mudiay is kind of a hybrid, maybe more talented than Russell but didn't come through traditional channels, similar to Porzingis. So I don't think who goes three is "clear" at all.

>Everybody else is talented, but there is a gap between those
>5-6 dudes and everybody. Ba maybe right and there could be 14
>starters in this draft. I doubt it though. I'd rather use
>those 2nds to take some fliers and gamble. Not at 3 though.

Yeah I think there are some good audition guys in the second but I am not advocating gambling in fact I am saying go for the surest bet (Winslow) but if you can get him and another guy, which the Sixers potentially could in this situation, that would be ideal