>The speculation is this is as good as Oakfor will ever be.
>The speculation is that Russell is going to be better in
>2-3yrs.

Word? From who? Not me. You're a goddamned liar if that's what you're saying I said.

>That's not context.

>And then you
>guys started throwing out Lopez and shitting on his career.

AGAIN. CONTEXT, LIAR.

>FOR THE RECORD. Oakfor is a better NBA player today.

I'm ok with that. I haven't argued against that. If you weren't such a filthy liar who ignored the context which statements are made, you'd know that.

>And
>will be down the line.

Very well might be. I haven't said or implied that this isn't probable.

I'd still think that if he had gone #2
>and we had drafted Russell. I also think we would develop
>Russell better here.

Cool. What's this got to do with you being a filthy liar though?