GTA's "script" is shitty and cliche

I love the game, btw. Great game.

But the "script" is dogshit.


>NO, you pay $60 for everything. AAA games have stories and I
>expect a story.

No, you expect an experience. A story is one way to deliver
an experience. There are plenty of games with stories with
awful, trite experiences.

NMS is a game without a "story" that gives you hours and hours
and hours of incredible experiences.


>Tell that to the millions of people that play MGS5 online...

>YOU haven't touched online but enough people play online for
>Rockstar to offer MULTIPLE EXPANSIONS. Your points are shit.

BWAHAHAHAHA. No, dickface. YOU'RE MAKING MY POINT:

I paid 60 dollars for BOTH GTA5 and MGSV. I GOT MY MONEY'S
WORTH BECAUSE OF THE EXPERIENCE THAT THEY GAVE ME, DESPITE
not touching the on-line. I think that's GREAT that people
play that stuff and enjoy it. Hell, EYE might start getting
into that.

But I pay for ENJOYMENT. The GTA ENJOYMENT, from the CAMPAIGN
ALONE, was worth that price point.

NMS, at this pace, is going to give me waaaaaaaaay more
ENJOYMENT.

>You aren't realistic or honest. This games makes sense at $45.
>At $60 I have to judge it in line with the competition.

Right. It is going to give MORE than the competition.

It's probably worth 80 or 90 dollars, tbh.


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "