So because Activism has more random people with hands in the
pot, it's okay for them to charge you more than the small team
who worked their ass off, actually put original thought into
their project?

Holy shit!

People really think this way?

This is so scary

>I said:
>
>FYI, I don't buy Call of Duty games past the one that started
>the trend of yearly releases on the PS3. The game is worth at
>most $42 to me.

But worth more than an indy that people enjoy just as much?
Because it has a board of directors to answer to and had
expensive music (because of an overpriced studio and other
worthless shit that doesn't actually make the game better)?

>If corporations had me by the balls you put it I would've
>bought SFV as incomplete as it is at full price and enjoyed
>it. I refer to myself as an educated consumer aware of the
>value proposition associated with AAA games released by
>publishers under development for years. NMS is not worth $60
>to me the same way COD isn't worth $60 to me.

Nah, you're changing up:

You made excuses as to why you don't REFLEXIVELY bitch about
the AAA games being more, and pointed to Board of Directors and
dumbass cut scenes and expensive music

That has nothing to do with nothing

You pay for an experience

if NMS gives people a great experience, one comparable to
COD, there's no justification for why it should be cheaper

It doesn't make any sense



----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "