>The only thing that matters is this:
>
>Does the experience in COD AUTOMATICALLY make it worth
>more than an indy game?
>
>The answer is: Of course not.
>
>You accept it, because you accept it. And you rationalize
>it with all this "the music is expensive" stuff that has
>nothing to do with nothing.
>
>Weird how corporations have y'all by the balls.
>
>Y'all actually think because a corporation did it, it's
>more valuable?
>
>Lulz
>
>I thought we stopped thinking like that in 11th grade

I said:

FYI, I don't buy Call of Duty games past the one that started the trend of yearly releases on the PS3. The game is worth at most $42 to me.

If corporations had me by the balls you put it I would've bought SFV as incomplete as it is at full price and enjoyed it. I refer to myself as an educated consumer aware of the value proposition associated with AAA games released by publishers under development for years. NMS is not worth $60 to me the same way COD isn't worth $60 to me.