You posted a bunch of links and that was that.

Sure, they're "justified" because they own the patents.... but then, that's precisely NOT the argument here though, is it? It's not an argument about whether or not they currently have the legal right to sue based on whether they own the patents.

So....hate to burst your happy little bubble-way to go, you kinda but not really but at least looked like you scored a point on the internet!!! LMFAO!!!- but not a single word you've said at any point on the matter detracts from the bottom line: Apple is a shining example of patent law gone crazy. THAT'S what this is about.

And guess what?

THE FUCKING JUDGE MORE OR LESS SEES IT MY WAY.

How's that for "smooth shut down"? A guy whose job it is to form *legal* opinions on things and rule on them.... thinks patent laws have gone off the deep end. Which is my point.... That you disagree with... but I got smooth shut down?

I'm in stitches, really.